Current:Home > StocksAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -MoneyStream
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-15 18:03:25
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Federal lawsuit seeks to block Texas book ban over sexual content ratings
- Chris Eubanks finds newfound fame after Wimbledon run. Can he stay hot ahead of US Open?
- Biden’s son Hunter heads to a Delaware court where he’s expected to plead guilty to tax crimes
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- 'Haunted Mansion' review: Don't expect a ton of chills in Disney's safe ghost ride
- Kelly Ripa Is Thirsting Over This Shirtless Photo of Mark Consuelos at the Pool
- Where the 2024 Republican presidential candidates stand on China
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- 10,000 red drum to be stocked in Calcasieu Lake estuary as part of pilot program
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Swimmer Katie Ledecky ties Michael Phelps' record, breaks others at World Championships
- Vanderpump Rules’ Ariana Madix Makes Dig at Ex Tom Sandoval on Love Island USA
- Biden’s dog Commander has bitten Secret Service officers 10 times in four months, records show
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- US steps up warnings to Guatemalan officials about election interference
- When do new 'Justified: City Primeval' episodes come out? Cast, schedule, how to watch
- Attorney for ex-student charged in California stabbing deaths says he’s not mentally fit for trial
Recommendation
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
Chinese and Russian officials to join North Korean commemorations of Korean War armistice
Decades in prison for 3 sentenced in North Dakota fentanyl trafficking probe
How does acupuncture work? Understand why so many people swear by it.
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Justin Herbert agrees to massive deal with Chargers, becomes NFL's highest-paid quarterback
After 40 years, a teenage victim of the Midwest's 'interstate' serial killer is identified
Pedestrians scatter as fire causes New York construction crane’s arm to collapse and crash to street